🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim could survive losing against Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Regarding Formation and Philosophy

For example, this was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to fire them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.